A latest proposal from Parrot Protocol’s workforce, a Solana-based liquidity community, has sparked controversy amongst its group members. The proposal, up for vote till July 27, requires the redemption of its PRT tokens for liquid treasury worth, and the transition to a no-token protocol.
Based mostly on the proposal, the PRT redemption value was established at $0.0045 per token. In accordance to knowledge from CryptoRank, the protocol raised over $89 million since its inception in 2021, with a present return on funding (ROI) of -89% for traders in its Preliminary DEX Providing (IDO) and preliminary alternate providing (IEO). Having a adverse ROI signifies that traders have misplaced cash on their funding.
At present in governance was a mistake information: @gopartyparrot workforce takes their $72m remaining in ICO funds and makes an attempt to separate it $12m to the token holders, $60m to the workforce.
Oh additionally they early unlocked their tokens and will probably be voting it by no matter what anyone else says pic.twitter.com/vmhDXJochQ
— Spreek (@spreekaway) July 21, 2023
The protocol’s plan doesn’t clarify the explanations behind the transfer, solely mentioning that “many PRT holders wish to redeem their PRT tokens for his or her treasury worth.” The proposal additionally follows adjustments in Parrot’s tokenomics from November 2022, when the protocol shortened its token locking interval from 12 months to 7 days, claiming it could “create extra flexibility for stakeholders to enter or exit their positions.”
Feedback from group members point out that 81% of tokens are managed by the workforce. Nevertheless, Parrot’s workforce has refuted these claims by stating on Twitter that treasury tokens are by no means touched or used for governance functions. A breakdown offered by CryptoRank signifies that 35% of tokens had been distributed as Protocol Incentives, 20% as Group & Angels, 10% as public gross sales, 20% as Seed rounds, and 15% as Others.
Moreover, the proposal doesn’t make clear what could be the destiny of unclaimed funds after the 8-week redemption interval, with group members suggesting the funds may very well be cashed out by insiders.
“The group has already defined in painstaking element why we’re not on this. The professional-rata worth is an excessive lowball and fails to account for most of the workforce’s misuses of the treasury with out the group’s consent. The workforce additionally prematurely unlocked the workforce and VCs’ vesting tokens, so they’re the bulk token holders, making this vote meaningless and a complete farce,” wrote one group member on the proposal dialogue.
Journal: Twister Money 2.0 — The race to construct protected and authorized coin mixers